DEFORMATIONS, THE ORIGIN OF MAN, AND HOMO SAPIENS ALBINOS

Since we can never go back in time, for that is impossible, the only sure way to obtain a perfect knowledge of how the origin of the first humans species came forth would be the utilisation of speculation and the use of ”common wisdom" to present it. These may offer us glimpses about what we shall never be capable of comprehending about nature and its great work. In the absence of this perfect manner, we do not see anything wrong with this technique since there are no better procedure than this to enable us visualise what our forefathers themselves grappled with so many centuries ago. The knowledge offers us the hope of human beings evolving from what seemed to be chaos and purposeless world of the unintelligent diverse primitive beings. Successfully, these primitive beings succeeded in performing minute discoveries themselves that enabled them to survive in the unstable, tumultuous, and young planet earth.

But when it comes to the evolving of the Homo sapiens Albinos from the Homo sapiens Africanus, the latter which nature could called COMPLETE and MATURED in the universe of human beings, this occurred only through deformations. This theory of deformation is not built on speculation and the use of common sense guidance; rather as admonished by Albert Einstein the greatest physicist, it was based on “observable fact of experience.” Because “the law of causality has not the significance of a statement as to the world of experience, except when observable facts ultimately appear as causes and effects.” (Einstein 1952: 113). It is a theory that has the basis of modern manner of propounding a theory that pertains to nature. This is capable of offering mankind genuine and authentic knowledge about themselves or reality because the conclusions had been based solely on “scientific facts” instead of speculations. Not on the sundry surmising that change when the knowledgeable things are affecting certain people or the truth had been finally unveiled. We witness them daily and since we discovered these experiences they had shattered all the speculations made by the Homo sapiens Albinos about themselves since time immemorial. It is not easy to twist scientific facts for they shall one day be uncovered and allowed the truth alone to surface. That is why science had been called “progressive discipline” for the unveiling of scientific truths usually shatters the mediocre postulate which usually does not survive in the world of increasing knowledge and truths.

The knowledge that those pioneer human beings were primitive and had gradually matured with time is not something people would argue against. It was characteristic with the whole creative process which never became perfect especially with the manner the universe emerged from the big bang. The cooling process of the earth and other bodies took billion of years and this had been also speculated by scientists, that it took a great deal of time for the emergence of other species that roamed about and became extinct to allow other species to come forth. Therefore, if the humans of the earth had no knowledge of how to open the mouth to speak, at a certain time they did and managed to invent fire and other vital mechanisms to aid them to survive on the planet earth. With the discovery of those things that helped them to survive, they increased in numbers and managed to populate the planet earth.

But just as many things that happened to them resulted from accidents through trial and error, the emergence of the Homo sapiens Albinos, those that wrongly referred to themselves as “white” only came forth through deformations. This theory does not have to come from someone who is from such and such a continent. We have lived and seen ourselves how certain people had used the advantage they had had to have succeeded in manipulating the whole world and as mentioned elsewhere those days are gone. We shall not succumb to the pressure of those who had led the world through manipulation by inventing things that did not match reality to describe themselves. We shall from henceforth investigate it ourselves but not only depend on the findings of “Mr White” or a Homo sapiens Albino to bring scientific truth to the public. If for many years the answers and scientific truths that came from them had been final, we reject these things now and make proper analysis and investigations to reach scientific truths about nature.

The myth of Homo sapiens Albinos that they are the original human beings or they are the perfect one had been shattered just as Einstein, Newton, and others shattered many mediaeval myths that had made the inhabitants of the world to crawl for ages.

Their emergence into the planet earth was only possible through deformations, which we visualise them daily in our very eyes in the pioneer continent of Africa that had withstood all excavations made through the centuries.

Bibliography
Bendyshe, T. Ed. (1865). The Anthropological Treatise of Johan Friedrich Blumenbach. London: Anthropological Society; 1865: 99, 269.

Cohen, M. R. & Nagel, E. (1949). An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Limited.

Close, F. (1989). The quark structure of matter. In The New Physics. Pp. 396-424. (Ed.) Davies, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Darwin, C. (1889). On the Origin of Species… (Authorised edition from English ed. II); New York.

Davies, P. (Ed.) (1989). The New Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Davies, P. (1989). The new physics: a synthesis. In The New Physics. Pp. 1-33. (Ed.) Davies, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Einstein, A. (1952). “The Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity,” In: The Principle of Relativity. A Collection of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theory of Relativity. Transl. by W. Perrett and G. B. Jeffery, Pp. 111-164). New York: Dover Publications, Inc. (Also in Annalen der Physik, 49, 1916).

Einstein, A. (1952). “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies,” In: The Principle of Relativity. A Collection of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theory of Relativity. Transl. by W. Perrett and G. B. Jeffery, Pp. 37-65. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.

Einstein, A. (1952). “On the Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light,” In: The Principle of Relativity. A Collection of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theory of Relativity. Transl. by W. Perrett and G. B. Jeffery, Pp. 99-109. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.

Epstein, L. C. (1992). Relativity Visualized. San Francisco: Insight Press.

Ford, J. (1989). What is chaos, that we should be mindful of it? In The New Physics. Pp. 348-371. (Ed.) Davies, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gay, P. (Ed.) (1973). The Enlightenment. A Comprehensive Anthology. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Garraty, J., & Gay, P. (Eds.) (1972). The Columbia History of the World. New York: Harper & Row.

Georgi, H. M. (1989). Grand unified theories. In The New Physics. Pp. 425-445. (Ed.) Davies, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Guerlac, H. (1961). Lavoisier—the Crucial Year. Ithaca, New York.

Guth, A. & Steinhardt, P. (1989). The inflationary universe. In The New Physics. Pp. 34-60. (Ed.) Davies, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hawking, S. (1989). The edge of spacetime. In The New Physics. Pp. 61-69. (Ed.) Davies, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hawking, S. (2001). The Universe in a Nutshell. The Inspiring Sequel to A Brief History of Time. London: Transworld Publishers.

Heath, T. L. (1897). The Works of Archimedes. Cambridge: University Press.

Heath, T. L. (1908). The Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements Translated from the Text of Heiberg with Introduction and Commentary. 2 Ed. Cambridge: University Press.

Heath, T. L (1949). Mathematics in Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hutchins, R. M. (Ed.) (1952). Newton & Huygens 34. Great Books of the Western World. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.

Isham, C. (1989). Quantum gravity. In The New Physics. Pp. 70-93. (Ed.) Davies, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jönsson, A-M. (2007). “Ett öppet krig—per correspondens,”Forskning & Framsteg. Nr 1, Jan-Feb, pp. 22-25.

Knight, P. (1989). Quantum optics. In The New Physics. Pp. 289-315. (Ed.) Davies, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolution. 2nd Edition. The International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Vol2., No. 2. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lave, L. (1988). Cognition in Practice. Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leggert, A. (1989). Low temperature physics, superconductivity and superfluidity. In The New Physics. Pp. 268-287. (Ed.) Davies, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lerner, E. J. (1991).The Big Bang Never Happened. A Startling Refutation of the Dominant Theory of the Origin of the Universe. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Lloyd, E. (1980). Handbook of Applicable Mathematics Vol. II Probability. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Longair, M. (1989). The new astrophysics. In The New Physics. Pp. 94-208. (Ed.) Davies, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lorentz, H. A. (1931). Lectures on Theoretical Physics. Delivered at the University of Leiden. Vol. III Transl. by L. Silberstein & Trivelli. London: Macmillan and Co., LTD.

Lorentz, H. A., Einstein, A., Minkowski, H. & Weyl, H. (1952). The Principle of Relativity. A Collection of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theory of Relativity. Transl. by W. Perrett and G. B. Jeffery, New York: Dover Publications, Inc.

Lorentz, H. A. (1952). “Electromagnetic Phenomena in a System Moving with any Velocity less than that of Light,” In The Principle of Relativity. A Collection of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theory of Relativity. Transl. by W. Perrett and G. B. Jeffery, Pp. 11-34. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.

Maddox, J. (1998). What Remains to be Discovered. London: Macmillan.

Mach, E. (1976). Knowledge and Error. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Maxwell, J. C. (1877ed). Matter and Motion. London.

Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science. Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.

Newton, I. (1999). The Principia. Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Transl. By Cohen, Bernard & Whitman, Anne. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Nicolis, G. (1989). Physics of far-from-equilibrium systems and self-organisation. In The New Physics. Pp. 316-347. (Ed.) Davies, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nilsson, E. (2007). “Blommar som kunde gjort Linné till Darwin,” Forskning & Framsteg. Nr 1, Jan-Feb, pp. 26-31.

Partington, J. R. (1951). A Short History of Chemistry. London.

Piaget, J. (1972). The Principle of Genetic Epistemology. Transl.: Mays, W. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Smith, N. K. (Transl.) (1982). Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Kant, E. (first published 1929). London: Macmillan Press LTD.

Suppes, P. (1957). Introduction to Logic. New York: D. Van Nostrand Company.

Von Linné, Carl. (1956). A Photographic Facsmile of the First volume of the 10th Edition. London: British Museum of Natural History; 1956:20-22.

Witzig, R. (1996). The Medicalization of Race: Scientific Legitimization of a Flawed Social Construct. Annals of Internal Medicine, October Vol. 125, 8: 675-679.

Development / Ghana / Africa / modernghana.com