THE STUMBLING BLOCKS IN THE PATH OF GHANA'S ECONOMIC GROWTH

On Saturday 18 April, 2009, the London Guardian carried a piece by one of its columnists, Polly Toynbee, in which she described how a group of women at Mangoase, in Akuapem, Ghana, are using micro-credit to finance small businesses .

She had visited Mangoase in the company of the deputy leader of the British Labour Party, Miss Harriet Harman.

Each of the 50 women in the group sat fanning themselves with their pass books, feeding babies, waiting their turn, she wrote. They added the equivalent of a dollar or two to their savings or to pay back a small loan that had launched “life-changing businesses”, such as smoking fish to sell, buying beans and cassava to sell by the road side, or building a small bar, a few breeze blocks at a time.

“This credit union deals in micro-sums for micro-businesses, but enough to send a child to school, buy a school uniform or exercise books”. Miss Toynbee reported. The credit unions were set up by “Plan UK”, she added. The crash of Wall Street “reaches right here, hitting these women too in soaring prices and threatened social cuts,” said Polly Toynbee.

Ghana, which had “met its millennium goals on children in primary education and cutting poverty”, had been “an economic and political success story”, with high growth. But last year, world food and oil prices had soared. So the last government had borrowed to cover these unexpected costs, with the result that the currency had dropped in value; inflation had risen to 20 per cent; and credit had “dried up.”

Polly Toynbee noted: “If rich countries had kept their 2005 Gleneagles promises, as Britain did, Ghana would have received $1bn, with no need to borrow at all. Where should Ghana turn? To the IMF, of course”.

But there was “deep political and public resistance” to the Fund, after previous bad experience with its prescriptions.

“Remember how humiliated Britain felt going cap in hand to the Fund in 1976?” she asked. “Ghanaians know how World Bank and IMF largesse came with neo-liberal quack remedies. Cutting public services, making the poor poorer, putting cash crops and trade before welfare was the old IMF way…. The World Bank insisted on a private insurance model for Ghana's health service that has been administratively expensive and wasteful… The IMF wants subsidies for electricity removed, again hitting the poorest hardest”.

According to Ms Toynbee, Oxfam's senior policy adviser and economist, Max Lawson, doubts that such cuts are needed — “just a loan to tide Ghana over”, he thinks. He adds: “The IMF is too brutal”; it demands “balanced books within one or two years”.

Polly Toynbee's article was a sympathetic and penetrating appraisal of the economic difficulties of a developing country. But probably because it showed such a deep understanding of Ghana's problems, it brought a torrent of venom on her head.

In a classic demonstration of the 'Little England' mentality that abounds amongst some of the chattering classes in Britain, Polly was pilloried for deigning, not to comment on the burning topic of the day — the uncovering, by a blogger, of a secret scheme hacked by one of prime minister Brown's advisers, Damian McBride, to smear leading Conservative politicians — but on what was going on 'in far-away Ghana.' Many commenters also sneered at “those corrupt Africans”, whose corruption and incompetence had brought them their economic woes.

The debate can be found on the web at:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/18/ghana-economy-imf-polly-toynbee?commentpage=2

Happily, the hostile views expressed were not left unchallenged.

For instance, one Rabbitin pointed out that “in a nutshell, the poverty of Ghana and SubSaharahan Africa in general is imposed. SubSaharahanAfrica is in an economic jail”. I don't have enough space to quote everything he said, but it can be found at the Guardian website.

Kantara Kamara thanked him for acknowledging that we are in an “economic jail. African intellectuals with their heads screwed on right, he said, had been saying this for an infinity of years, yet many Westerners kept regarding Africans as “beggars”.

Kantara Kamara then enlightened the Guardian readership thus:

“SubSaharanAfrica [he wrote] was INSERTED into the Western capitalist economic pattern by force of arms… to fulfil the single purpose of providing the raw materials that enable Britain [for instance] to have enough money to feed and care for its own citizens, while being able to accumulate enough of a surplus to dangle before the countries of SubSaharanAfrica as generous “aid”…

“If Polly [Toynbee] had ventured from Mangoase to Tema, [he continued] she would not have failed to observe a chain of huge silos, which stand empty…. They were meant to store cocoa beans at times when the world cocoa price was too low for cocoa to be exported profitably.

“The IMF, staffed almost entirely by people raised in the gambling houses of the world commodity markets, realised that successfully storing cocoa in the producing countries, instead of in the consuming countries,(as at present) could [alter, or] “distort” the [balance of power in the] traditional cocoa marketing system, by depriving the commodity speculators of the valuable “chips” on which their gambling gains depended.

“In other words, control of the supply by the producers would prevent commodity speculators from being the main beneficiaries of the proceeds from the labour of the cocoa farmers. So when Kwame Nkrumah — who conceived of the idea of storing cocoa in hard times — was overthrown in 1966, the IMF advised the soldiers to abandon the idea.  Continued    Source: Cameron Duodu

"The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of Modernghana.com." To have your articles publish, please submit them to editor@modernghana.com.

Other Articles by Cameron Duodu

More Headlines